Talk:USS Enterprise

Is this it?


This does not for a moment look like the standard Constitution-class that the Enterprise is. I don't think this is the USS Enterprise at all. The ship does deserve an article, but under its rightful name. --SvipTalk 16:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Then maybe we should seperate the articles. I forgot they used that kind of ship.
 * It's okay. But I am still unsure what to call their ship.  If we do not have a name, we need a more "placeholder" like name, e.g. "Spaceship (original Star Trek cast)" or something. --SvipTalk 17:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Or maybe something like USS Rocket (after all, it is a rocket) or USR Rocket (United States Rocket Rocket). Something more trekkie.
 * If its name appears in the episode, mentioned in transcripts or discussed in commentaries, then pick that, if not, go with something simplistic like I previously suggested. --SvipTalk 20:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

It's not a rocket. It's electromagnetically powered. In fact, the only matter expelled is when they use the maneuvering thrusters. Thus: not a rocket. Rockets shoot flames out the back. And I only came here to complain that that ship in the dirt clearly isn't the enterprise (the nacelles are all wrong, and there's three of them). So yeah... I mean, there are only a dozen ships named Enterprise in the Star Trek universe, so it's not beyond the realm of possibility that this could be another Enterprise. Just not the Enterprise. --Buddy 22:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)